Connect with us

Main Story

President Tinubu Trounces PDP, LP again

Published

on

Shortly after Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu was declared the President-elect by the electoral umpire, Independent National Election Commission (INEC), he had gone to visit that boardroom politician, Tony Elumelu. As he was alighting from his vehicle, Elumelu, a man not given to flippancy, nor bootlicking hailed him: The last man standing. Tinubu only chuckled.

Elumelu perhaps was not the author of the tag. Asiwaju has bestridden the political landscape of the country like a colossus since his governorship days between 199 and 2007. His many battles with a despotic and dictatorial Obasanjo’s presidency is legendary. He confronted the wily General on all fronts both on the soap box and in the Court rooms. And he has won all the battles. Truly he is the last man standing.

Now duly elected and affirmed President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Asiwaju, perhaps studied the works of the celebrated Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (“Master Sun”),and acclaimed author of Arts of War he work, who says: “If you know yourself, and knows your wars, if you fight a thousand wars, you will hardly lose one”. Bola Tinubu surely knows his wars and his people. Therefore, he hardly lose any war.

He took not one but three presidential election candidates to the cleaners. For more than five months, he stood toe-to-toe with the three of them faced squarely all the barrages of allegations hurled at him from different directions. He took all the punches and Wednesday, (6 September 2023, the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPT) found none of the allegations against his person, or his election sustainable. They were all dismissed.

The five-man tribunal dismissed the case filed by both the candidates of the Allied Movement of Nigeria (APM), the Labour Party (LP) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against the victory of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, thus the presidential election tribunal, in a unanimous judgement, upheld the victory of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The tribunal ruled that Nigeria’s main opposition parties failed to prove claims of electoral malpractice against the governing All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2023 presidential election.
The panel of Judges rejected all claims made by Obi and Atiku, including fraud, charges electoral authorities broke the law and allegations that Tinubu was ineligible to run.

www.focusmagazineonline.com recalled that in the electoral history of Nigeria, no legal challenge to the outcome of a presidential election has succeeded.
A window of appeal at the Supreme Court is still open to the aggrieved parties and their candidates to try to dismiss the tribunal’s ruling.
LP and Obi had already rejected the ruling of the PEPT, saying it does not align with the desire of the people.

However in a five-hour marathon judgement of the panel’s ruling on the substantive case filed by the defeated Labour candidate, Justice Haruna Tsammani said the case lacked material facts and unmeritorious.
He also said 10 of the 13 witnesses who gave evidence were rejected for not being frontloaded with the petition, thus violating section 285 of the Nigerian constitution, section 137(7) of the Electoral Act 2022.

The law specifically states all evidence accompanying a petition must be filed within 21 days.
Justice Tsammani said by virtue of section 285 of the Nigerian constitution, section 137(7) of the Electoral Act 2022, and other provisions, every witness statement on oath must be filed along with the petition.

He said that based on the Supreme Court authority, once the 21 days window for filing an election petition lapses, the content of the petition cannot be amended.
The presidential election court also rejected the reports of forensic analyses tendered by the three witnesses of the Labour Party for either being made during the pendency of the case or made by an interested party who would benefit from the outcome of the petitions.

The court rejected the European Union report on the 25 February presidential election on the grounds that they were not tendered by an official of the body which is the author and has the custody of the document.
The court upheld the respondents’ objection to the admissibility of evidence tendered by Mr Obi’s web engineer, Mpeh Ogar, regarding a technical glitch observed on INEC Results Viewing portal on the election day.

The judge held that Ms Ogar was an interested party in the petition having vied for elective office at the polls on the platform of the Labour.
The court trashed all the issues raised by Obi and his party to disqualify Tinubu and Shettima and nullify their election
The court ruled that both Tinubu and Shettima were qualified to contest the election.

Justice Tsammani said INEC’s failure to upload the result of the election on iRev did not invalidate the election as INEC can do so anyhow it wants.
He said both the Electoral Act and INEC regulations provide for manual collation of results. Electronic transmission is at best optional, he added.
Justice Tsammani quoting previous court orders said INEC cannot be compelled to transmit the results of the election electronically.

On the $460,000 alleged narcotics money forfeited by Tinubu in the US in 1993, the tribunal said the Illinois case was a civil forfeiture case, not a criminal one.
Justice Tsammani said from the evidence before the court, Tinubu was not convicted, sentenced, arraigned and did not take any plea before the court in the US
Justice Tsammani said Obi and his party failed to show substantial non-compliance with the Electoral Act by INEC in declaring Tinubu as winner of the 25 February election.
Justice Tsammani also rubbished the position of Obi that Tinubu must win 25 percent of the votes in the FCT. He said the view presents a parochial interpretation of the Nigerian constitution.

Some Issues Trashed by Justice Tsammani:
*Allegation of double nomination against Vice-President Kashim Shettima was false
*Mr Tinubu was qualified to contest the 25 February election
*10 out of 13 witnesses of Peter Obi not competent to testify as they were not frontloaded in compliance with the law
*EU report on the outcome of the 2023 election inadmissible. It needed to be tendered by EU, the author of the document.
*The reports tendered by Mr Obi’s expert witnesses useless .
*The US court forfeiture Tinubu’s $460,000 does not disqualify him from running for the presidency.
*Failure of INEC to upload the copies of polling unit results to IReV real time does not invalidate the election.
*INEC is not bound to transmit election results electronically.
*No evidence to show that INEC deliberately refused to upload copies of polling unit results to IReV to manipulate it.
* Obi fails to prove the allegations that INEC failed to comply with the Electoral Act in the conduct of the election.
*No solid evidence to back allegations of suppression of votes, wrong computation of results, manipulation of results, and inflation of results, corrupt practices.
*Insistence that Tinubu must win 25 per cent of votes in the FCT a parochial interpretation of section 134(2) of the Nigerian constitution and also fallacious.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Main Story

Real Reasons Makinde Refuses To Announce New Alaafin

Published

on

Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State

Some fresh facts have started emerging why Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State rejected the candidate selected by the body of Oyomesi,(Kingmakers) in Oyo Town, to succeed the departed Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Lamidi Atanda Adeyemi 11.

The late monarch died on April 22, 2022 and since then, over nineteen months, a successor is yet to be announced.
No less than sixty-five princess from the Agunloye Ruling House, including an octogenarian priest, Bishop Ayo Ladigbolu, did put in an application to succeed the late flamboyant monarch. But after a laborious exercise, that lasted about four months, the Oyomesi claimed that they have submitted a name to the Executive Governor since 30 September, 2022.
The Governor on his part neither confirmed nor denied being in possession of a recommended name from the Oyomesi. But he just kept mute and refused to announced a name.

The body of Oyomesi however, speculatively approached the State High Court, sitting in oyo town, when they suspected that the Governor might announced a different candidate from their preferred choice. The case is still pending before the State Chief Judge who is yet to assign it to a trial Judge.
But in a new twists, www.focusmagazineonline.com gathered in the ancient town of Oyo that the Governor ‘might be protecting the ancient stool from despoliation by his tardiness in announcing a substantive Alaafin’.

Since 1823, Sokoto Caliphate has had a near obsession to annex Oyo into its estate, using the proxy emirate at Ilorin.
A source revealed to www.focusmagazineonline.com that there are a lot of external influences circling around the Oyomesi trying to influence the selection process.
It was further revealed that a prince with very deep affiliation to the Caliphate through Ilorin, and had gotten the support of the Sultan of Sokoto had successfully infiltrated the Oyomesi to influence the successor of Adeyemi III.

The prince was said to have the confidence of the Chief Imam of Oyo Town and that of the Muslims’ Rights Council (MURIC), in his bid to ascend the throne.
‘These people put immense pressure on the Bashorun to compromise the selection process, so that he can recommend the selection of a prince with Fulani blood’.
‘This prince’, www.focusmagazineonline.com further gathered, ‘has more loyalty to Usman Dan Fodio philosophy and heritage than the Yoruba heritage’.

Governor Makinde was said to have seen through the shenanigans and decided to outrightly cancelled the selection process and ordered a fresh one, which the Oyomesi strongly objected to.
The source revealed that ‘Governor Seyi Makinde rejected the process at the risk of his second term in office and insisted on a new selection process with total autonomy of the Oyomesi from Sokoto/Ilorin Fulani caliphate’s influence’.

Continue Reading

Main Story

EFCC Arraigns 11 OAU Undergraduates for Alleged Internet Fraud

Published

on

Eleven of the sixty-nine students of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun State, arrested by the operatives of the Ibadan Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Wednesday (31 October) over alleged fraudulent internet activities have been charged to court.

The remaining fifty-eight arrested students have since been released.
The students were arraigned before Justice Nathaniel Ayo-Emmanuel of the Federal High Court, Osogbo for their alleged involvement in internet fraud.
www.focusmagazineonline.com recalled that about 69 students of the institution were arrested over alleged fraudulent internet activities at the end of the operation. The operation reportedly lasted between about 1.40 a.m. and 4 a.m. on Wednesday. The suspects were ferried to the EFCC zonal office in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital for interrogations.

This was disclosed in a statement by the Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Dele Oyewale, on Tuesday (07 November).
Oyewale said the defendants were arraigned on different count charges, ranging from one to six charges, as preferred against them by the EFCC.
The defendants are: Perekebena Olombeni Micah, Nnekwelugo Nnaemeka, Moyosore Favour Oluwasakin, Aghwaritoma Wisdom Obaro, Daniel Olashile Maiye, Gbolahan Khalid Adesina, Yinka Temitope Jayeola, Olumuyiwa Emmanuel Adeleye, Abiola Emmanuel Oluwadare, Busari Abdulazeez Ayodeji and Okesipe Tobiloba Paul.

Nine of the defendants were arraigned on one-count charge each, while the remaining two: Micah and Obaro, had six-count charges filed against each of them.
One of the counts reads: “That you, Perekebena Olombeni Micah sometimes in 2023 in Osogbo, Osun State within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court did fraudulently impersonated the name – Pies through your Whatsapp account phone number +1(414)367-9473 by claiming that you are an American Female in love with your victims in the United States of America with intent to gain advantage for yourself and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 22 (2) (b) (i) and punishable under Section 22 (2) (b) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act, 2015.”

Another count reads: “That you, Aghwaritoma Wisdom Obaro on or about 1st November, 2023 at Ile-Ife, Osun State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, fraudulently impersonated by representing yourself to be a white man by name Alex Stephens from United States of America to one Megan Johnson, through your Google Chat and your email address (alexsteps678@gmail.com) with intent to gain advantage for yourself and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 22 (2) (b) (i) and punishable under Section 22 (2) (b) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act, 2015.”

Upon their arraignments, they all pleaded “not guilty” to the charges when they were read to them.
Consequently, prosecution counsel, Oluwatoyin Owodunni, prayed the court for trial dates and the remand of the defendants in a Correctional Centre.
In response, defence counsels to Ayodeji, Adesina, Oluwasakin, Micah, Adeleye and Okesipe informed the court of “motions for bail applications” filed on behalf of their clients, which have been served on the prosecution, therefore urging the court to admit the six defendants to bail in the most liberal terms.

Justice Ayo-Emmanuel, having listened to the prayers of both parties, admitted Ayodeji, Adesina, Oluwasakin, Micah, Adeleye and Okesipe to bail.
Ayodeji, Adesina, Oluwasakin, Adeleye and Okesipe were admitted to bail in the sum of N2 million each, while Micah was granted bail in the sum of N3 million.
Other bail conditions are: two sureties in like sum, first surety must be the defendant’s father or mother; the second surety must be a relative, sibling, clergy or civil servant with the Osun State Government; the sureties must depose to an affidavit of means and both residential and office addresses of the sureties, as well as their statuses, must be provided and verified by the court registrar.

The judge adjourned the matters to November 29 and December 12, 2023 respectively for commencement of trial and remanded the defendants at the Ilesha Correctional Centre, Osun State pending the perfection of their bail conditions.

The defendants were among the 69 suspected internet fraudsters arrested on November 1, 2023 at Oduduwa Estate area of Ile-Ife in Osun State following actionable intelligence on their alleged involvement in fraudulent internet-related activities.

Continue Reading

Main Story

Nigerians Says No as Labour Declare Strike

Published

on

Organised Labour, consisting of the leadership of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress, (TUC), have been advised to shelve their proposed nationwide strike slated to take off on November 14.

Many Nigerians spoken to were particularly displeased that the workers could be contemplating such an economic debilitating move at this point in time, when the nation is grasping for breath economically.

www.focusmagazineonline.com recalled that the leadership of the two unions on Tuesday (07 November) declared a total nationwide strike effective November 14, 2023.
The leadership of the two unions reached the resolution after an extraordinary National Executive Council meeting on Tuesday in Abuja.
The leadership of the NLC and the TUC had summoned what the unions described as an extraordinary NEC meeting.

The aim of the meeting was to review the modalities of the planned strike following the brutalisation of the National President of the NLC, Joe Ajaero, review of the Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Federal Government and the organised labour on October 2, 2023, following the removal of the subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit which the labour centres said has caused “untold hardship” to Nigerians.

The labour unions had, on Friday, issued a five-day ultimatum over the earlier arrest of the National President of the NLC, by the police in Owerri, Imo State, on Wednesday.
The labour centres demanded the redeployment of the commissioner of police in the state and the arrest and prosecution of the aide of the government who was alleged to have perpetrated the attack.

The unions also threatened to embark on a nationwide industrial action if their demands were not met in five days from Friday.
But a Labour Lawyer, Mr. Richard Akinola counselled the unions to perish the plan, at least for now.
He wrote, ‘dear NLC, l was one person that came out unapologetically to condemn the brutalization of your president, Joe Ajaero in Imo state and l still stand by that condemnation.
‘However, by declaring a national strike over that assault is stretching your luck too far. You have trivialized strike as a tool that nobody takes you serious again. You have demystified yourself and the potency of strike. So, you mean workers in Maiduguri would go on strike because of what happened in imo?

He added that ‘you people mean employers who have no trade dispute with their workers would shut down in this struggling economy and you expect them to pay the workers? When you abuse the power of strike, it loses its potency. You guys must be joking’, he warned the workers.

An Ikeja based businessman, Engr. Charles Nwaneke was more furious. He lamented the huge wage bills he had to contends with every month, and now the workers are planning to disrupt what was left of his staggering business.

He urged the workers to always towed a path of peace and development.
www.focusmagazineonline.com recalled that NLC President, Ajaero was arrested by the police ahead of the state-wide protest in Imo on Wednesday. This was disclosed by the NLC’s Head of Information, Benson Upah.

Although the police denied arresting Ajaero, stating that he was merely taken into protective custody to prevent a mob attack, the Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, accused the labour leader of meddling in the political affairs of the state.

The attack on the labour leader has been condemned by many prominent Nigerians and civil society organisations, including the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 elections, Peter Obi, and human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN).

Continue Reading

Trending